register or login: password: remember me

The O.P. » Talk Room

The O.P. • View topic - Michael Cera not interested in an AD movie

Michael Cera not interested in an AD movie

Random thoughts about Arrested Development that don't fit into the above categories.

Postby so's your face » September 16th, 2008, 10:50 am

i don't think he knows what he's saying...
so's your face
On The Staircar
 
Posts: 799
Joined: April 17th, 2005, 9:45 pm
Location: columbus, oh

Postby arrestedfanuk5 » September 17th, 2008, 5:10 pm

Illusion Michael wrote:
arrestedfanuk5 wrote:
Illusion Michael wrote:Lots of TV shows have made movies and in my opinion they have never been as good as the show, which Cera is probably concerned about.


It never did any harm to Trailer park boys


I LOVE the Trailer Park Boys, but didn't think much of the film. I guess it gave extra exposure for the TV show though.




The movie had to appeal to and attract people who are less fortunate in the brain department, but it was still a great film and better than alot others. The series is GENIUS, i prefer the first 4 series, but the seventh season was a big improvment on the sixth, basically, I love trailer park boys.
Doesn't it strike you as mildly ironic, that most of the people who are against abortion, are the peope who you wouldnt want to bleep in the first place
arrestedfanuk5
Off The Hook
 
Posts: 138
Joined: April 1st, 2008, 10:10 am
Location: Manchester

Postby Frightened Inmate #2 » September 18th, 2008, 7:44 am

arrestedfanuk5 wrote:...basically, I love trailer park boys.


When you say that in lower case, it sounds a little dodgy.
Image

Check out Frightened Inmate #2's "retro" blog. It's not quite Bob Loblaw's Law Blog... but what is?
Frightened Inmate #2
Bluth Company Boardmember
 
Posts: 4083
Joined: February 1st, 2005, 9:08 am
Location: Lititz, PA

Postby arrestedfanuk5 » September 18th, 2008, 11:21 am

Frightened Inmate #2 wrote:
arrestedfanuk5 wrote:...basically, I love trailer park boys.


When you say that in lower case, it sounds a little dodgy.


:lol:
Doesn't it strike you as mildly ironic, that most of the people who are against abortion, are the peope who you wouldnt want to bleep in the first place
arrestedfanuk5
Off The Hook
 
Posts: 138
Joined: April 1st, 2008, 10:10 am
Location: Manchester

Postby smeddy » September 28th, 2008, 6:01 am

(The actor would gladly reprise his role as George-Michael Bluth if "Arrested Development" creator Mitchell Hurwitz "decided it was something he wants to do." Says Cera: "If he was going to proceed with it, he would want to make sure it was going to be done right.")

http://www.mercurynews.com/entertainment/ci_10547313
smeddy
Off The Hook
 
Posts: 231
Joined: June 18th, 2007, 11:54 am

Postby smeddy » September 29th, 2008, 9:10 am

Michael Cera:

You’ve been quoted saying that you didn’t think there would be much interest in an “Arrested Development” movie, but there are still constant rumors that it will get made. What’s the status now?

People have asked me about a movie since the show was cancelled, but I don’t know. I think people will ask about it for a long time. Whatever the case, nothing I say will dictate anything.

But if it does get made, will you be in it?

It would depend on a lot of things. It’s pretty hypothetical. I know there’s a page for the movie on IMDb, which is strange because I know it’s definitely not that real.

The TV-to-movie transition worked for “Sex and the City,” another show with a loyal following that was huge on DVD. Do you think that helps in any way?

I never know how many people were aware of “Arrested Development.” It’s hard to have any kind of indication of what would happen with a movie. The show was so self-referential. If people aren’t familiar with it already, the movie might be difficult to understand.

http://orlando.metromix.com/movies/article/q-and-a-michael/632847/content

All I can say is: Come on!

I reckon that if they make it, the show's reputation, it's pretty big fanbase, the opportunity for a great plot, some great trailers and great reviews will make this the must-see comedy of the year.
smeddy
Off The Hook
 
Posts: 231
Joined: June 18th, 2007, 11:54 am

Postby Frightened Inmate #2 » September 29th, 2008, 10:49 am

I'm not sure why the small audience the TV show had should have a bearing on the making of a movie, anyway. I mean, think about all of the movies that were made that had no TV show whatsoever to build upon. I mean, "Caddyshack"? No built-in audience whatsoever. "Titanic"? Just a bunch of boring educational programs, at best. "Batman"? OK, that one did have a TV show, but c'mon!

"Arrested Development" already has 5-6 million ticket buyers built in. That should give you a budget of $40-50 million that you'll recoup provided the movie is of reasonable quality.
Image

Check out Frightened Inmate #2's "retro" blog. It's not quite Bob Loblaw's Law Blog... but what is?
Frightened Inmate #2
Bluth Company Boardmember
 
Posts: 4083
Joined: February 1st, 2005, 9:08 am
Location: Lititz, PA

Postby I Got A Stew Going » September 30th, 2008, 8:28 pm

Damn that Cera!

Big Hollywood's got him in their pocket! :wink:
I Got A Stew Going
Off The Hook
 
Posts: 357
Joined: December 8th, 2005, 4:52 pm

Postby Do7d4N » October 6th, 2008, 1:48 am

Frightened Inmate #2 wrote:I'm not sure why the small audience the TV show had should have a bearing on the making of a movie, anyway. I mean, think about all of the movies that were made that had no TV show whatsoever to build upon. I mean, "Caddyshack"? No built-in audience whatsoever. "Titanic"? Just a bunch of boring educational programs, at best. "Batman"? OK, that one did have a TV show, but c'mon!

"Arrested Development" already has 5-6 million ticket buyers built in. That should give you a budget of $40-50 million that you'll recoup provided the movie is of reasonable quality.


:?

You do know that Titanic isnt based on a documentry right :lol:

Also, without wanting to get on the guys back, he doesnt exactly sound excited by the idea of playing GM.
Do7d4N
Never Been More Proud
 
Posts: 40
Joined: April 3rd, 2008, 3:37 am

Postby smeddy » October 6th, 2008, 2:21 am

I was going to watch Titanic, but someone ruined the ending for me :P
smeddy
Off The Hook
 
Posts: 231
Joined: June 18th, 2007, 11:54 am

Postby Kid Viravax » October 20th, 2008, 4:06 pm

I think with films like this where a large cast is needed (and all of them as vital as the others) you need one or two of the bigger names on board for it to gain momentum.

Obviously if you get Bateman (who clearly is) on board, the writers (who clearly are) and one or two other cast members, more will follow.

I'm not concerned, we will see more AD one time.
Kid Viravax
Through The Roof
 
Posts: 86
Joined: July 8th, 2007, 6:04 pm
Location: having pop-pop in the attic

Postby gobias30 » October 20th, 2008, 7:24 pm

Kid Viravax wrote:I'm not concerned, we will see more AD one time.


That's the spirit!
Hey, Mikey, relax. It’s just a giant banana.
gobias30
On The Staircar
 
Posts: 594
Joined: August 21st, 2007, 8:37 pm

Postby arrestedfanuk5 » November 27th, 2008, 7:20 pm

smeddy wrote:I was going to watch Titanic, but someone ruined the ending for me :P



I watched the alternative ending. No sinking, just sailing.

Do not watch the alternative ending.
Doesn't it strike you as mildly ironic, that most of the people who are against abortion, are the peope who you wouldnt want to bleep in the first place
arrestedfanuk5
Off The Hook
 
Posts: 138
Joined: April 1st, 2008, 10:10 am
Location: Manchester

Postby Do7d4N » November 29th, 2008, 1:37 pm

Its on now and im not singing the song... ok i am.
Do7d4N
Never Been More Proud
 
Posts: 40
Joined: April 3rd, 2008, 3:37 am

Previous

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests